
Hey Beautiful People!
Well, had another mellow but successful day here in what's boiling down to my last week in Philadelphia. The first priority on the agenda for today was to check out the ICA, otherwise known as the Institute for Contemporary Art. The ICA is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania, and since the mid-1960's has featured emerging and contemporary artists. This seemed like a "not-to-miss" thing to see in Philadelphia, so I made the trek across the Shuylkill River to see what all the fuss was about. My college buddy Eric accompanied me on the journey, since it fit right into the window of time when he needed to be out of his house because it's being sold and the realtor was having an open house this afternoon
. (Anyone in the market for a rowhouse near the Italian Market? Let me know and I'll give you all the info.)
Here's an experience I have had a number of times in my life: I don't always pay attention to the pop media, so it's not uncommon that a movie will be released that I haven't heard about, especially if it doesn't hit the public radio radar. Every once in a while, I'll make plans to go see a movie with a friend, and just go into the theater not having a single inkling about what I'm about to be faced with. It's about completely surrendering to someone else's whims, and I have rarely been disappointed in this experience. I do the same thing probably more often with food, but I think I've made my point.
It was similar going to the ICA today. I knew I had to go, but I didn't know a bit about the what they were showing. I arrived ready to be educated. Always a good position to embrace, in my humble opinion.So the first show was titled "Make Your Own Life: Artists In and Out of Cologne." Unbeknownst to little old me, Cologne, Germany was an art hub in Europe a few decades ago. This show brought together artists from the past thirty years. To be honest, most of it didn't do much for me. I want to be drawn in, and when work is more conceptual, I really appreciate when a museum makes the effort to have good support material, namely signage that explains a little about what's going on. I know that this is controversial in the art world - some people want to figure it out for themselves before being told what it's about. I'm the opposite. I love to look at a piece of art briefly. If it speaks to me in some way, I will take the time to read what's written about it on the wall. Then I feel some sort of connection with the artist, or not. From there, I can decide whether or not I like it.
One piece I liked was by Christian Philipp Müller. It was a curtain like the ones you see when you go into some fancy restaurants in the winter, where the function of the curtain is to keep the cold out of the restaurant. It's in the doorway. Know what I'm talking about? Good. Let's move on.
Next to the curtain is one of those waiter's stands with a pile of menus, a phone, other ephemera that you would expect - there's a "menu" open on top that is the part of the installation we're allowed to interact with. The menu is a hilarious rant on modern art, listing artists and their work with prices, as if it was a real menu. The work listed is all imaginary, as far as I can tell. It was such an "insiders" piece, and I honestly felt like I needed to brush up on my art history, but I could get enough of it to really appreciate the piece and its commentary on the art market and linking it to the exclusivity of high culture.
The other piece that caught my eye was a video performance. It was a woman who was obviously a little drunk, standing between two paintings and talking about contemporary art. It's hard to explain, but it reminded me of the way I feel when going to crowded art openings or hearing non-artists talking about art.
Then we went up to the second level. The transitional space is referred to as the "Ramp Project" where they had the work of Philadelphia artist and 2006 Whitney Biennial chosen one Zoe Strauss. I really liked this show - she took these really intimate photos of city streets. From a distance, the pictures all looked like low-class scenes, but her eye was really keen and I appreciated her sensitivity without being heavy handed. Then we saw the Project Space where they had a show called "Soft Sites." This term is about site-specific work that relates to globalization and the environment, so of course I was really interested in seeing how others interpreted the format.
This piece by Mary Ellen Carroll is called "Late" and here's how it goes: This is a performance piece. She had this car and she actually arrived late for her opening at some museum. She drove her car up on the steps and left it there for the duration of the show. Yeah, kinda silly, but her photo documents of the piece were beautiful and I really loved how she made such a silly stupid idea into a contemplative experience. Have I proven my point? Maybe not. Oh well. It's not my problem really. This is my blog so deal with it.
The last show was the best, in my opinion. It was also a surprise, one that really unfolded by reading about the work on the wall signs. It was the photography of Candida Höfer and the show was called "Architecture of Absence." She has been taking photographs for over 30 years of public places that are devoid of humans. When this "landscape" is viewed in this way, the patterns start to emerge, as well as the stories about "who usually inhabits this space?" We are accustomed to seeing such places teeming with bodies, so there's a definite curiosity about the work. As with all great photography, the use of high-resolution film and a Hasselblad camera creates such sensuous detail that it makes the desolate scenery come to life. As Eric pointed out in a photo of a projection booth in a theater, "you can see the fibers on the seats." Yum.Eric made another interesting comment when we were looking at the first show of the Cologne artists. He said that this made my work seem so tame. I cant' agree with him more. My approach on this residency has not begun from the hand, but more from the brain. I guess my normal work is like this too - I have to make sure I have a good, fresh idea before I want to start making something. I don't have any judgments about other approaches to art making, where an intimate relationship between the tool and the maker evokes form, and that's all that's necessary. Both approaches are equally valid, and there are many other nuances that fit between the cracks of these extremes.
The rest of the day was spent doing necessary, but mundane tasks that I will not bore you with, gentle reader, but rest assured, I know exactly what I'm going to be wearing next Friday night.
I know this past week has been a blogapalooza since I haven't had my co-residents about to tempt my agenda. Tomorrow I leave for D.C. bright an early, and don't expect to report back for a few days. This will be a busy week wrapping up things around here. In many ways it will be bittersweet. Stay tuned for details. Don't worry - I won't give you too much information about the bitterness. It'll be all about the sweets. Mostly.



















































