I just found out that I lost my venue for my Natural Selection show this summer. The Portland Art Center is closing, due to financial constraints. I'm determined to find another venue, feel confident that I can hold onto the grant funding I secured, possibly even raise some more in the meantime, but any disappointment I'm now feeling is for the loss of this fantastic venue for installation art in Portland. I can't say I wasn't entirely prepared for their closing--there have been multiple articles in the Oregonian recently about the brouhaha with the board quitting, accusations and rumors of all sorts being broadcast far and wide. I feel some sympathy for the director Gavin Shettler who, it seems to me, was really trying his level best to do a really great thing. I hope he can lick his wounds from this public drama and rise again with a great contribution to the Portland art scene.
As for me, I have some more ideas for possible venues and am going to get right on preparing my proposals. I feel momentum for this project that's been a long time coming, and once I set my focus on something, it's hard to get me off track, so I will perservere in making Natural Selection a reality. In some ways, I would love to just take my time with this show now that I'm motivated with no time constraints--take the time to really get it done right because it's a huge amount of work. On the other hand, with two respectable granting organizations supporting this project, I feel the responsibility to make this show happen this year.I am really grateful that I started in on the work this week--I have three of the bonsai pieces in the works right now that I'm really excited about and will show you when they're done, hopefully next week. I have been contemplating this week what to actually show of this project in the blog. The bigger question is this: if I reveal each work as it's completed, will it spoil the effect of the show? Or: is it more valid to document the process of putting a show of this magnitude together in the blog because it will still feel new if a reader were to follow the process and then attend the actual show?
I think the latter option is the best, and I'll tell you why with a backstory. I took my first art history class in high school--it was a really great experience that I am still thankful for. I spent the better part of my teenage years at a very small private but very rural high school in California called the Midland School. How small? Well, the entire student body was around 80, but size isn't everything, and there were times where they definitely used it to their advantage. The best example of this was that if you had three students who were interested in a topic, and one teacher who could teach that subject, you could make a class on any subject. In the year 1983, four adventurous students decided we wanted to learn about art history and there was one dear teacher who happened to have freshly graduated with an art history degree from Williams College, and a class was born. To this day, I have no idea if there has ever been another art history class since in the history of Midland School. Even though, thanks to my mom, I probably knew more than most kids my age about modern art, this class opened up a whole new structured world for me. And the beauty of it was--there we were, four very different young women, sitting in a small unheated classroom at rickety desks with our giant Jansons History of Art tomes where only a select few works were chosen to make the color section. Everything else was poorly reproduced black and white reproductions. But we still loved that book because it was our ticket to the world. I also treated it like a scrapbook, putting in newspaper clippings or postcards related to the things we studied--the image you see above is the cover of my actual book, (which we silkscreened with an inside joke derived from a rare Tom Petty song) and the previous two are some selected art-related clippings.
During the spring term, the teacher arranged a field trip where we went down to the Norton Simon Museum in Pasadena and got to see some REAL art. That museum didn't own a lot of what we had actually studied, but I still cherish this image taken of us with Brancusi's "Bird in Space." (That's me doing a full body genuflection/reflection!) This is exactly how it felt to us--we were finally getting to "meet" our heroes. To this day, I still get a thrill when I actually SEE something in a museum I've only seen in print before. Even though textbooks have improved a gazillion times in the past two decades, it's just sooooooo much better to see art in person, but often even more meaningful when you feel an attachment to something in print first. Comprende? Are we coming full circle yet on my digression?The other thought I had about blogging about the Natural Selection project is that I think it's rare for an artist to publicly share their process of professionally mounting a show. There are so many details that need to go into an art exhibition, and I would hope that some of you would find some interest in hearing how I do it. It's always a learning process for me, and this is definitely the most complex show I've ever taken on. So stay tuned, dear reader, if you're game for this "wild" ride. I'll leave you with this final image from my early art history days--my friend Laura decided she'd attend our final exam dressed as Augustus of Primaporta, one of the Roman sculptures we studied--it still cracks me up the way she tied that teddy bear to her leg like the child in the statue. Click on it to see it in its full glory!





















